Sunday, June 23, 2013

Kentucky School News and Commentary: The revolution is here

boycottI?ve written a lot about growing resistance to high-stakes standardized testing and other corporate-driven school reforms. In the following piece, the argument is made that the revolution against the reform movement is here. It was written by Jeff Bryant, an Associate Fellow at the Campaign for America?s Future and the owner of a marketing and communications consultancy. It serves numerous organizations including Human Rights Watch, Doctors Without Borders, PBS, and International Planned Parenthood Foundation. He writes extensively about public education policy at The Education Opportunity Network. Follow Jeff on Twitter: jeffbcdm
This from Jeff Bryant:
?It?s always hard to tell for sure exactly when a revolution starts,? wrote John Tierny in The Atlantic? recently. ?I?m not an expert on revolutions,? he continued, ?but even I can see that a new one is taking shape in American K-12 public education.?

In the piece titled, ?The Coming Revolution in Public Education,? Tierney pointed to a number of signs:

*Teachers refusing to give standardized tests, parents opting their kids out of tests, and students boycotting tests.
*Legislators reconsidering testing and expressing concerns about corruption in the testing industry.
*Voucher and other ?choice? proposals being strongly contested and voted down in states that had been friendly to them.
Tierney linked to a blog post by yours truly, ?The Inconvenient Truth of Education Reform,? explaining how the movement known as ?education reform? has committed severe harm to the populations it professes to serve while spreading corruption and enriching businesses and political figures.

Echoing Tierney, on the pages of Slate, The Nation, and elsewhere, David Kirp, education professor and author of a popular new book casting doubt on competitive driven, market-based school reform, declared that cheating scandals and parent rebellions over high stakes standardized testing were proof that much ballyhooed reform policies championed by New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Education Secretary Arne Duncan are not ?a proven ? or even a promising ? way to make schools better.?

Kirp declared that mounting evidence from school reform efforts in major U.S. metropolitan areas reveals ?it?s a terrible time for advocates of market-driven reform in public education. For more than a decade, their strategy ? which makes teachers? careers turn on student gains in reading and math tests, and promotes competition through charter schools and vouchers ? has been the dominant policy mantra. But now the cracks are showing.?

In a legislative view, the Progressive State Network, which supports left-leaning state legislators and monitors legislative policy in state houses, noticed ?a backlash is brewing in many states as more and more parents and legislators alike start asking questions about corporate education reform.? The post on PSN?s website referenced Tierney?s article and highlighted a Minnesota bill that eliminates testing requirements for graduation and several states that are embroiled in battles to defeat measures known as the ?parent trigger,? which enables private takeovers of public schools.

These observations are not alarmist chatter but well-reasoned, valid conclusions that anti-government collectivist actions related to public school policy are scaling up from isolated protests to a nationwide movement of unified resistance.

The movement is widespread among teachers, students, and parents. It is grassroots driven and way out in front of most journalists and political leaders. And it?s scaling up in intensity.

A Teacher-Student-Parent Movement

For quite some time now, education historian and reform opponent Diane Ravitch has written about the ever expanding discontent among teachers over the emphasis on standardized testing and test-based teacher evaluation and school rating systems.

As proof of this discontent, Ravitch has closely followed and commented on a boycott against standardized testing among teachers in Seattle, an ongoing protest among principals in New York state against new teacher evaluations, and objections to the ?testing beast? among educators and parents in Texas.

In ever-greater numbers, however, students are also leading the resistance. A recent article in The Nation reported on the growing student resistance movement driven by grievances over austerity budgets and systemic racism.

From all corners of the country ? North Carolina to Philadelphia to Louisiana to Chicago ? students as young as eight years old are organizing and taking part in a variety of actions including zombie protests, school walkouts and sit-ins, and acts of defiance like the recent rant by a high school student in Texas that went viral over the Internet when he castigated a seemingly indifferent teacher for dispensing education in ?packets? rather than engaging the class in meaningful, relevant learning.

In Chicago, youth voice is forming in grassroots groups like CSOSOS (Chicago Students Organizing To Save Our Schools) and VOYCE (Voices of Youth in Chicago Education) that have led prominent, headline-earning protests to school closures, teacher firings, and over emphasis on high-stakes testing.

In Philadelphia, a handful of students used their social media and organizing skills to whip up student resentment and send hundreds of students into the streets to protest budget cuts to their favorite education programs.

In Denver, high schoolers have formed Students4OurSchools and staged walkouts protesting the over-emphasis on standardized testing.

Students in Philadelphia, Providence, Rhode Island, Portland, Oregon, and elsewhere have formed student unions that have developed attention-getting tactics, which have spread to a national scale. These student organizations? Facebook pages speak in unison against school closures and cutbacks, widespread teacher firings, and top-down implementations of mandated standards and high-stakes testing.

In many places, teachers and parents are supporting rebellious students and even joining in the protests. Grassroots parent groups, in fact, have been the driving force behind efforts to beat back school voucher proposals in Tennessee and parent trigger legislation in Florida.

Resistance is particularly vehement in low-income communities of color in large urban school districts where reform measures have lead to widespread teacher firings and school closings. In Chicago, Philadelphia, New York City, Cleveland, and Detroit, vocal protestors have been organizing in their own communities but also uniting in national campaigns, such as this year?s Journey for Justice effort that brought hundreds of activists in allied grassroots organizations to the White House to protest school closings.

Unlike school reform proponents who benefit from massive donations from rich foundations and politically connected funders, grassroots groups leading the resistance ? like the Alliance for Educational Justice and Alliance for Quality Education ? have far humbler means and few connections to the political class and deep pocketed philanthropists like Bill Gates.

Nevertheless, these groups have generated strong outpourings of popular dissent and produced important analyses of the duplicity of the reform agenda.

A Movement Getting More Recognition

Mostly, grassroots-led protests against education mandates have gotten little attention from even the few media outlets and reporters focused on education.

That changed, however, when the head of the American Federation of Teachers, Randi Weingarten, called for a moratorium on the consequences of high-stakes testing related to the Common Core.

All of a sudden, when there was a crack in the conventional wisdom that education policy was a centrist agreement between teachers? unions and conservative belief tanks, many education bloggers and journalists decided the school accountability movement had reached a surprising new level of intensity.

Long-time education journalist Dana Goldstein speculated on her blog that Weingarten?s moratorium call is proof that education matters that were once considered products of a ?coalition? of centrist-minded ? although mostly conservative ? wonks and Beltway operatives are now points of strong contention.

Her conclusion was that these differences represent a ?deep divide? among the political class about whether it?s a good idea to ?scare us into meaningful school reform.?

Another experienced education journalist, Sam Chaltain also reflected on his blog on calls for a testing moratorium. He recalled that after Barak Obama was elected,?Obama proceeded with ?a series of education policies that further entrenched America?s reliance on reading and math scores as a proxy for whole-school evaluation.?

Critics of those policies ?vented,? Chaltain explained, but ?policymakers nodded. And absent any real noise, the tests continued.? But with this more recent backlash to education mandates, Chaltain observed, ?policymakers have been unable to ignore a groundswell of noise and resistance.?

Chaltain concluded that conflicts over school policy had ?reached a tipping point.?

Similarly, veteran education reporter at Education Week Michelle McNeil observed, ?Not since the battles over school desegregation has the debate about public education been so intense and polarized.?

McNeil sourced the polarity to the conventional wisdom that public education is ?an institution that historically is slow to change,? and now it?s being ?forced to deal with so much change at once.? And she asserts that the controversy over change is mostly ?about centralization or decentralization? of specific ?reform? efforts.

But what Goldstein, McNeil, and others on the sidelines fail to grasp is that the pushback against the nation?s education policy is not new. The ?polarization? is not ?obscuring? the issues ? as?McNeil contends ? it?s clarifying them. And the ?debate? over education has broken free from being an issue confined to ?fringes? and ?policy elites? to take its rightful place at the center of ?a growing, broader backlash.?

Indeed, just like the fight to integrate public schools was connected to the larger struggle for civil rights, fights to preserve and strengthen public schools ? whether they take the form of students walking out of class to protest education cuts, parents fighting against deceptively named ?empowerment? policies, or teachers boycotting standardized tests ? are connected to much larger struggles over what kind of nation America is becoming.

A Leadership Out Of Touch

The growing rebellion to education mandates has been driven mostly by grassroots groups formed first among low-income communities of color, but now the movement is extending to people of greater means and social-political capacity like parent groups that worked an inside game with state legislators to thwart implementation of the Common Core standards in Indiana, block parent trigger bills in Florida, and curb the emphasis on high stakes testing in Texas.

This unification of the grassroots with the ?grass tops? in education is not well understood in the media or among policy elites.

In fact, people in charge of education governance appear to be more clueless than ever about what they are intent on accomplishing and legislating.

Witness the recent confession from one of the movement?s most influential leaders, Bridgeport, Conn., school chief Paul Vallas. As Valerie Strauss reported on this blog, The Answer Sheet, Vallas has led reform efforts in Chicago, Philadelphia, and New Orleans that have become blueprints for education policy ideas across the country. Yet he admitted that the policies he has championed are resulting in a ?nightmare? of complexity.

Reportedly, he characterized his efforts to enact test-based teacher evaluations as a feature of a ?testing industrial complex? and ?a system where you literally have binders on individual teachers with rubrics that are so complicated ? that they?ll just make you suicidal.?

Vallas? newfound doubts over what he has created reflected other confusing comments from education policy leaders. Most notable was the commentary by Bill Gates, widely acknowledged as a leader in the movement to base teacher evaluations and school ratings on student test scores, warning against the ?rush to implement new teacher development and evaluation systems? based on test scores.

Even more perplexing was Secretary Duncan?s recent inability to deliver a straight answer about parent trigger bills. As Beltway gadfly Alexander Russo recently reported, ?Duncan described the trigger as ?an important tool? for parent involvement ? but not the only or even the most important one? ? whatever that means.

Compared to authentic grassroots outpourings for resources, equity, and real democracy, these equivocations from education policy leaders are puny and venal to say the least.

Intensity Is Building

?Scared? or not, recalling Goldstein?s comment, activists driving protests against the nation?s prevailing education policies are ratcheting the fight to unprecedented intensity that will likely become even more forceful in future efforts.

Later this month, for instance, teachers in Chicago are planning a citywide three-day march to protest impending school closures. Education related bills in state legislatures in California, Texas, New York, North Carolina, and elsewhere will be highly visible points of contention. And actions to protest the imminent doubling of college loan debt interest rates ? certainly an issue related to public education ? are generating a unified response from hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Clearly, the resistance to top-down education mandates is building. The movement is propelled by forces far greater than what education journalists and policy leaders understand ? widespread grievances about inequity, unfairness, and public disempowerment.

The revolt is happening. The revolt is now.

Source: http://theprincipal.blogspot.com/2013/06/the-revolution-is-here.html

academy of country music awards brad paisley zac brown band aubrey born to run pranks pregnancy test

Federal nullification efforts mounting in states

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) ? Imagine the scenario: A federal agent attempts to arrest someone for illegally selling a machine gun. Instead, the federal agent is arrested ? charged in a state court with the crime of enforcing federal gun laws.

Farfetched? Not as much as you might think.

The scenario would become conceivable if legislation passed by Missouri's Republican-led Legislature is signed into law by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon.

The Missouri legislation is perhaps the most extreme example of a states' rights movement that has been spreading across the nation. States are increasingly adopting laws that purport to nullify federal laws ? setting up intentional legal conflicts, directing local police not to enforce federal laws and, in rare cases, even threatening criminal charges for federal agents who dare to do their jobs.

An Associated Press analysis found that about four-fifths of the states now have enacted local laws that directly reject or ignore federal laws on marijuana use, gun control, health insurance requirements and identification standards for driver's licenses. The recent trend began in Democratic leaning California with a 1996 medical marijuana law and has proliferated lately in Republican strongholds like Kansas, where Gov. Sam Brownback this spring became the first to sign a measure threatening felony charges against federal agents who enforce certain firearms laws in his state.

Some states, such as Montana and Arizona, have said "no" to the feds again and again ? passing states' rights measures on all four subjects examined by the AP ? despite questions about whether their "no" carries any legal significance.

"It seems that there has been an uptick in nullification efforts from both the left and the right," said Adam Winkler, a professor at the University of California at Los Angeles who specializes in constitutional law.

Yet "the law is clear ? the supremacy clause (of the U.S. Constitution) says specifically that the federal laws are supreme over contrary state laws, even if the state doesn't like those laws," Winkler added.

The fact that U.S. courts have repeatedly upheld federal laws over conflicting state ones hasn't stopped some states from flouting those federal laws ? sometimes successfully.

About 20 states now have medical marijuana laws allowing people to use pot to treat chronic pain and other ailments ? despite a federal law that still criminalizes marijuana distribution and possession. Ceding ground to the states, President Barack Obama's administration has made it known to federal prosecutors that it wasn't worth their time to target those people.

Federal authorities have repeatedly delayed implementation of the 2005 Real ID Act, an anti-terrorism law that set stringent requirements for photo identification cards to be used to board commercial flights or enter federal buildings. The law has been stymied, in part, because about half the state legislatures have opposed its implementation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

About 20 states have enacted measures challenging Obama's 2010 health care laws, many of which specifically reject the provision mandating that most people have health insurance or face tax penalties beginning in 2014.

After Montana passed a 2009 law declaring that federal firearms regulations don't apply to guns made and kept in that state, eight other states have enacted similar laws. Gun activist Gary Marbut said he crafted the Montana measure as a foundation for a legal challenge to the federal power to regulate interstate commerce under the U.S. Constitution. His lawsuit was dismissed by a trial judge but is now pending before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

"The states created this federal monster, and so it's time for the states to get their monster on a leash," said Marbut, president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association.

The Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that local police could not be compelled to carry out provisions of a federal gun control law. But some states are now attempting to take that a step further by asserting that certain federal laws can't even be enforced by federal authorities.

A new Kansas law makes it a felony for a federal agent to attempt to enforce laws on guns made and owned in Kansas. A similar Wyoming law, passed in 2010, made it a misdemeanor. The Missouri bill also would declare it a misdemeanor crime but would apply more broadly to all federal gun laws and regulations ? past, present, or future ? that "infringe on the people's right to keep and bear arms."

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter in late April to the Kansas governor warning that the federal government is willing to go to court over the new law.

"Kansas may not prevent federal employees and officials from carrying out their official responsibilities," Holder wrote.

Federal authorities in the western district of Missouri led the nation in prosecutions for federal weapons offenses through the first seven months of the 2013 fiscal year, with Kansas close behind, according to a data clearinghouse at Syracuse University.

Felons illegally possessing firearms is the most common charge nationally. But the Missouri measure sets it sights on nullifying federal firearms registrations and, among other things, a 1934 law that imposes a tax on transferring machine guns or silencers. Last year, the federal government prosecuted 83 people nationally for unlawful possession of machine guns.

So what would happen if a local prosecutor actually charges a federal agent for doing his or her job?

"They're going to have problems if they do it ? there's no doubt about it," said Michael Boldin, executive director of the Tenth Amendment Center, a Los Angeles-based entity that promotes states' rights. "There's no federal court in the country that's going to say that a state can pull this off."

Yet states may never need to prosecute federal agents in order to make their point.

If enough states resist, "it's going to be very difficult for the federal government to force their laws down our throats," Boldin said.

Missouri's governor has not said whether he will sign or veto the bill nullifying federal gun laws. Meanwhile, thousands of people have sent online messages to the governor's office about the legislation.

Signing the measure "will show other states how to resist the tyranny of federal bureaucrats who want to rob you of your right to self-defense," said one message, signed by Jim and Arlena Sowash, who own a gun shop in rural Stover, Mo.

Others urged a veto.

"Outlandish bills like this ? completely flouting our federal system ? make Missouri the laughingstock of the nation," said a message written by Ann Havelka, of the Kansas City suburb of Gladstone.

___

Follow David A. Lieb at: http://www.twitter.com/DavidALieb

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/federal-nullification-efforts-mounting-states-070843059.html

nfl mock draft 2012 norfolk island michael brockers lisa marie presley florida panthers tannehill joel ward

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Paula Deen Fired By The Food Network Over Racist Comments (VIDEOS)

Paula Deen Fired By The Food Network Over Racist Comments (VIDEOS)

Paula Deen..you're firedPaula Deen, the queen of Southern cooking on the Food Network, was dropped by the network on Friday. Deen had posted two videos apologizing for her racist language, but the Food network fired the celebrity chef anyway. Paula Deen failed to show up for an interview on the “Today” this morning, but later posted two ...

Paula Deen Fired By The Food Network Over Racist Comments (VIDEOS) Stupid Celebrities Gossip Stupid Celebrities Gossip News

Source: http://stupidcelebrities.net/2013/06/paula-deen-fired-by-the-food-network-over-racist-comments-videos/

2012 white house correspondents dinner forrest gump bernard hopkins devils la riots rachel maddow gia

Yahoo News on Obama's Africa Trip: "He Won't Be Stopping in the Country of His Birth" (Little green footballs)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/314403347?client_source=feed&format=rss

alicia keys Harbaugh brothers superbowl commercials randy moss randy moss OJ Brigance What Time Does The Superbowl Start 2013

Arts & Entertainment :: Television Or Movies Articles - eatable goodrich

Our own Cable TV Cable, specials widget at US Promo Deals makes all of this simple and to perform. You has the ability to order online and avoid long lasting discussions, or dial the cost free# to discuss your options with one of the advisable US Promo Deals sales associates for more details.
This LG 42LX6500 LED television set are inclined to right away take hold associated with ones attention by bringing usually the content alive with 3D Proactive technology with this television set which features a huge 42? Tv display for your monitoring enjoyment. This Television adjust has lots to provide visitors and also the most mandatory feature is most definately definitely is capacity to allow you in order to really enjoy 3D flicks.
A person been sick and tired of paying your wallet-ripping Cable or Tv bill each month? Do you wish to save your hard earned wealth and STILL be able appreciate all of your favorite services at the comfort of your hard drive?
Step have Satellite Tv for Computer or laptop you not only have positive effects over standard cable television.but conjointly more than common Satellite The telly. Picture you are in a not comfortable thunderstorm. vespertino satelite pour trujillo Probabilities are your web will be functioning most the entire time and your satellite most certainly be working barely ever. So I see this whenever the way of the chances. Shortly everybody will be seeing telly directly from their computer sites.
Consider some ways you can use diversion to help in establishment and sales. And greater importantly, think of the solutions these persuasion skills can be used to protect yourself from other programs trying to divert and coerce you.
Ceiling fans get to view one on the clearest scoreboards in the realm. Its HD-15 display and 1,512 lashes of resolution surpass that on the standard for 1080p HD video boards, and its LED technology allows it to show up that would 144 quadrillion shades of coloring.
Attached to course, Toshiba offers the industry standard 90-day warranty on mutually its notebooks and batteries. When buying from a third-party distributor, ask about their sure warranty plans.
Firstly, measure the expanse and point where you would wish collection the TV. Fixing a joke will help you determine exactly how LCD TV fits your house. It is also suggested to have a look on the seating but also furniture arrangement so that watchers will have an uncomplicated cover watching. you don?t desire to alter the furniture, may wish to purchase a display size that fits your actual contract. But if you like to do a handful of adjustments, you better arrange keep in mind this before paying for the Cable tv.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeT0QlJJhMc

So if you can bring in just a character, you can enjoy a bit of a wide range in your voice. Cons: However there have been lots of grievances about the VIZIO E322VL.

Source: http://sinsationzlingerie.co.uk/arts-entertainment-television-or-movies-articles/

barry sanders barry sanders jimmie johnson juan pablo montoya crash chardon high school shooting mark martin cleveland news

Source: http://eatable-goodrich.blogspot.com/2013/06/arts-entertainment-television-or-movies.html

HGTV Sugar Bowl 2013 chick fil a chick fil a rose parade bowl games rose bowl

Friday, June 21, 2013

In Syrian chemical weapons claim, criticism about lack of transparency (Washington Post)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/314253343?client_source=feed&format=rss

Lady Gaga New Girl Avalanna Gigi Chao Ed Hochuli Opie modern family

Instagram video: Parents need not change their approach with the new feature

Instagram now has video (15 seconds compared to Vine's six). Parents need not develop a new approach to Instagram's new video feature, though, and ConnectSafely's guide to Instagram still holds up.?

By Anne Collier,?Guest Blogger / June 21, 2013

Instagram founder Kevin Systrom talks about an added video feature to the Instagram program at Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif., June 20.

Marcio Jose Sanchez/Associated Press

Enlarge

Facebook?s little photo-sharing app just became a video-sharing app too. Whether they?re using Apple or Android phones, Instagram?s 130 million users can now simply pick whether that image they want to capture is better static or in motion, then click on either the little camera or videocam icon. If they go with video, they can capture up to 15 seconds (no looping over and over as in other video-sharing apps like Vine). The filters that have always added to the fun in this app are there for video too (13 of them for it), and they can pick the frame they want to use to represent that little video on their profile or wherever they share it. If their shooting isn?t very steady, there?s a pretty amazing feature called Cinema (for now just for iPhone 4s and 5) that stabilizes the video for them.

Skip to next paragraph Anne Collier

Guest Blogger

Anne Collier is editor of NetFamilyNews.org and co-director of ConnectSafely.org, a Web-based interactive forum and information site for teens, parents, educators, and everybody interested in the impact of the social Web on youth and vice versa. She lives in Northern California and has two sons.

Recent posts

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; // google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Everything else about this new addition is a lot like the photo part of Instagram ? which is almost more about illustrated conversations than mere photo-sharing. ?We?re still committed to making sure you have control over all of your content. Only the people who you let see your photos will be able to see your videos,? wrote Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom in the?IG blog. And we ConnectSafely folk have written a straightforward, 5-page?parents? guide to Instagram?that tells you how to help your kids keep it fun and constructive (we?re in the middle of updating it as I write this). Here?s coverage of the video announcement at?TechCrunch.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/hcqrt289UXk/Instagram-video-Parents-need-not-change-their-approach-with-the-new-feature

Google Keep ncaa scores Splash Ncaa Basketball Tournament NCAA Bracket 2013 Robert Morris spring